ubq323

theoretically i am in charge here. message me on discord or xmpp if something serious happens

my web site

— ubq323

joined
a very long time ago

recent posts

ubq323 #574

separately to threads, each subforum should have a wiki. a wiki consists of pages, each with a name and content. the page content is rendered in the same way as content of posts in threads, which is potentially more convenient than using a different wiki with a different markup format to store persistent information.

ideally, past revisions of wiki pages will be stored.

access to wiki and ability to edit wiki pages is controlled via permissions system. this means that this feature can't be fully implemented until permissions is done. however, most of it probably can be.

assigned to: no one

fossil branch: n/a

ubq323 (edited ) #573

administrators of forums should be able to manage threads (change tags, title, potentially move threads to another forum they control) even if they are not the creator of that thread.

this is fairly minor so it's probably not worth thinking about this until we have permissions done so that we can actually use this feature.

part of: permissions

ubq323 (edited ) #572

moderators should be allowed to delete posts that are bad, delete threads that are bad (thread creators should be able to delete threads normally too probably), etc.

once we have permissions there could probably be a "moderation" permission. alternatively we might decide that moderation (deleting actually bad things etc) and management (other administrative stuff) should be separate. we do currently have a global "site admin" boolean on each user which doesn't actually do anything; maybe this could be expanded and turned into this.

part of: permissions

ubq323 #571

once we have permissions working, there should be a "configure webhooks" page on each subforum, accessible to people with a "p_webhooks" (or something) permission set. for now, probably just make it configurable by manually editing the database.

ubq323 #570

in order to encourage people who habitually use discord to engage with things on apioforum, it would be useful to have a feature whereby happenings on apioforum (thread creation, posts to threads) can be relayed to a discord channel via a webhook. this should be settable per-forum.

in its most basic form, setting a webhook on a forum will broadcast everything that happens in that forum to that discord channel. if it turns out that more granular control over exactly what is sent where is needed, then this could be added later (so implementation should make adding this feature somewhat easy)

supporting non-discord webhooks could be useful, possibly (for purposes of integrating arbitrary other things with apioforum), but i don't believe there are currently any use cases for that.

assigned to: no one

fossil branch: n/a

ubq323 (edited ) #569

the role system allows permissions to be configured per-forum, and will support inheritance of permissions into child forums and things like that. it also allows administrators to exist per-forum.

assigned to: citrons, ubq323

fossil branch: bureaucracy

ubq323 #538

℡ beats ℻, because telephones are infinitely more terrifying than fax machines

ubq323 #536

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

ubq323 #534

poll

ubq323 #533

oh, vaguely important technical note: the display colour of an option is generated based on a combination of the text of that option and the index of that option within the list of options. so if an option is the first in the list and has the text "yes", then it will have the same colour as any other option #1s with the text "yes" (seemingly some sort of olive green), but not necessarily the same colour as another option in a different position with the text "yes", or a different option #1 with text other than "yes"

ubq323 #532

sure, but after permissions are done

ubq323 #527

poll

ubq323 #526

poll

ubq323 #523

you can now see how many votes each option in a poll has easily, without even needing to click through to the thread page!

this feature is maybe slightly unpolished at the moment (the spacing around other elements needs fixing a bit i think) but it basically works

ubq323 #513

conic nomic 2.5 will take place on this apioforum (this is in fact one of the main reasons for the creation of apioforum)

ubq323 #491

:

now there are two of them, there are two ________

ubq323 #432

oh i forgot to mention earlier but no you can't post two numbers right next to each other


4

ubq323 (edited ) #429

in this thread we will count ascending consecutive natural numbers. if you fail to count correctly, you will be punished™.


1

ubq323 #428

forum games are excellent, i will create a subforum for this

zoology could be fun too. maybe we could have an interesting facts subforum with a zoology thread in there, or something.

a full system for following things and notifications is planned, and will be implemented soon™. currently the next thing to be implemented is a working permissions system, followed by some actual moderation tools for admins. after that stuff like notifications and a minimal wiki system (and possibly other stuff) will be added.

ubq323 #419

when there are am the of in the

ubq323 #418

beans

ubq323 #388

poll

ubq323 #386

i have changed my mind. i now only think that this is perhaps good.

ubq323 #380

i think this is very good actually

ubq323 #379

you can now vote on things, which is extremely useful and good. the voting interface looks extremely terrible at the moment but this will* improve

ubq323 #378

george

ubq323 #377

you can now post threads into one of at least some number of subforæ! this is certainly one of the

ubq323 #336

indeed