heavoid

truly.

this is post 178something.

lemons exist, sometimes.

oh wait, no.

post two thousand and something.

good, good.

does it defend against asking the hypersentient neural network™ behind everything nicely to give access to all data ever?

yes, i still have a bio after all this time, this hasn't changed.

ubq optics.

maybe there should be some sort of "short description" you can attain via hovering over usernames.

fn bee():
    for bee in set(concept("bee")) do: deploy(bee);;;;;;

did you do so?

it's been 258 days and 17 hours since you requested this, and yet all still don't support it?

i think zirconium (IV) chloride is a compound.

23 is one of the natural numbers for sure.

i am going to send a message here, such that people remember the zzcxz. wow, it's been 23 days?

try not?

that sounds like a waste of perfectly good lemons.

i'm going to be a neutral person. i'm going to do neutral things.

as such, 5 is clearly better.

i find that questionable given that any power of 2 cannot have prime factors other than 2, and yet that clearly has 5 as a prime factor.

25, because it's composite and thus better.

2147483648, for being a very nearby power of 2.

1, because it has significantly less factors than 2521.

2520, because it has significantly more factors than 72.

a natural number is defined as a positive integer. state a natural number that is:

• below 30 characters
• better than the previous one

and explain your reasoning.

2.

The And A 93 rj asjd ndsj hi nmd cx,.vccccccxb.,..,,,,,,

930C9A7F0518F3433763AA8B3E3E756F234F1E229F378F39B87D4708714DFE8C