i ban the number 7.
i smash the situation machine. i obliterate it. i demolish every component. it is ablated until it is mere dust, and the dust fades in time.
quintopia: "it's turing complete except for a very critical part of what makes something turing complete". am i really the only one who sees a problem here? the "other prerequisite" is effectively just 'can you have a FSM of a certain size or more'.
when people act like computers are "basically" turing complete it really irks me. because what do you even mean by that? "there's so much memory it's basically infinite"? that's not even close to true, do you really think we have enough memory to run all algorithms we want to run? and why even bother talking about turing completeness if you don't really mean it?
it seemed hopeless, but then she realised there was a trapdoor behind her labelled "zzcxz".
it's not very interesting, and tends to burn out quickly. there's only so much to talk about talking.
i feel like that could lead to people metadiscussing the topic instead of discussing it.
talking about things without a topic is hard. sustaining a discussion on nothing is not possible. it's like the awfulness of small talk, but worse since it's in forum format.
english has about 8 letters per bit of actual information, just compress it optimally using Algorithms?
as cool as it sounds, i'm unlikely to be able to contribute meaningfully to the creation of a project right now. maybe i'd consider it more if it already existed and i could contribute to it, and it also had a cool codebase that was cool and not bad.
"last activity" should recurse upwards across subforae and also include actions like making subforæ.