viba

it seems akin to the difference between a restrictive and non-restrictive relative clause. for example:

non-narrowing: Lil ela kac. Kak isuca. → All of the cups, which I own, are full. (I own every single cup that exists, and they are all full)

narrowing: Lil ela kalc. Kak isuca. → All of the cups which I own are full. (this is exclusively a statement about the cups which I own)

alcui ces. cek eilai sas. kel iaksa alcuik. kek iksa.

ðis viz vertcw

nuy nyd "mek vötgilvidzis". vat gatðistem. ðis viz nuynolprp. but "nuy cwdmek vidzis baw witxiq"? nuy nötnon.

(tceniq: jor xiqzis buy vötgil vun cenkit. nötnufxiqzis buy vötgil viz jak.)

nuy mek nwbvötgilsic byk "ðytvötnwbsic wuzviz vötmektid buy mis" (I am making a new vötgil thread because the old one was deleted by accident)

plysey buy vötgil for "myw nuy van nolnuy" (please speak vötgil for my own amusement, and my own amusement only)

highly optimal

obligatory propaganda:

for me it only undergoes 2 levels of recursion before breaking

woah! you can now play ffbm inside of apioforum! what a great advancement in technological innovation

meow

help my excitement has entered a feedback loop and is rapidly increasing more and more and more and i am going to combust and explode into thousands of fiery pieces

balance has been restored to the universe

video games (kinda) maker gang

(the apionet bridge bot thing works again now, for the record)

ubq323 accidentally deleted a bunch of the apioforum database a while ago

also, more recently, the thing that bridges apioforum posts to apionet has stopped working, which is why nearly everyone has forgotten that apioforum exists

omg i love it

this is an interesting question. on one hand you could argue that "vötvöt" cancels itself out and thus "vötvötgil" is just english. however, according to my previous definition, vötvötgil would be a language devised in a vötgil-like fashion based on vötgil. this means creating a regularized orthography, minimizing the vocabulary to ~600 words, all of which are forced to be 3 letters, and putting it all into an eisenlangoidal grammar. but the thing is that vötgil is already all of these things, so no adjustments whatsoever are needed, therefore vötvötgil is vötgil.

vötgil for other languages would be a language devised in the same manner as vötgil except based on a language which is not english. I will not attempt to formulate what such a conlang would look like; I'll leave this to someone who is proficient/native in a natural language which is not english.

the answer is: no. it did not

learn vötgil

&a tickles my brain in an inexplicable way

I'm kind of a little bit iffy as to whether I think creating a second channel for long arguments is completely necessary. most of the arguments I find irritating are of the bad faith nature which the aforementioned guidelines are meant to prevent. but I also feel it could be beneficial in the long run, as do most other people

sorry, rehashing arguments was not my intention, it was just a feeling I wanted to express

someone going around telling people that things they are interested in are "objectively harmful and masochistic" or "regressive propaganda" doesn't seem very nice to me.

The vibahead is a head Light as Air.

Sex in Minecraft by Vargskelethor

it is indeed written in C.

good thing I happened to have already implemented a rudimentary memory allocator which I never ended up actually using.

every now and then I think to myself "maybe C++ isn't that bad". then I instantly remind myself that it is.

i don't even know why I have these thoughts in the first place. I have already concluded that C++ is not a language I will ever have any need or will to use in any case.

maybe you could look at QOI ("Quite OK Image format") (spec)? it's supposed to be quite simple to implement while still providing decent compression. i don't know much about it beyond this though

aha, I have heard vaguely of QOI from quintopia's site. perhaps I should have looked into it more. it seems like it could be quite good.