taswelll

please submit nonempty bio

— taswelll

joined
ago

recent posts

taswelll #3782

you dont need instructions, just do paru -S the-software

taswelll #3780

85

taswelll #3778

PING

taswelll #3773

euler evil arc

taswelll #3710

not a block.....

taswelll #3653

sourcehut diffs look festive

taswelll #3634

i endorse this

taswelll #3619

they end up being the same operations, i think

taswelll #3582

the first glass beach album by glass beach

taswelll #3564

i want to play one of the oldest hidden-role-social-deduction games ("amonglikes")

taswelll #3561

wow just like among us

taswelll #3470

apioforum uses markdown!

taswelll #3465

(i like useful)

taswelll #3464

it might be a bit more opaque but it's useful

taswelll #3457

beaned

taswelll #3454

have some powers of two, as a treat: 4294967296 2147483648 1073741824 536870912 268435456 134217728 67108864 33554432 16777216 8388608 4194304 2097152 1048576 524288 262144 131072 65536 32768 16384 8192 4096 2048 1024 512 256 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1

taswelll #3453

79

taswelll #3450

""Horner's method""

taswelll (edited ) #3449

yes! ax5 + bx4 + cx3 + dx2 + ex + f = f + x(e + x(d + x(c + x(b + ax))))

taswelll (edited ) #3445

this is right! this is how binary to decimal conversion works. the BNs are the the powers of two: each digit is the previous increased by itself => each digit is the previous multiplied by 2 => nth digit is 2 to the nth power.

positional base for a given B works the same way if you change "add all the powers of two where there is a one" to "add all the powers of K multiplied by the corresponding digit" (these are equivalent if K is 2; multiplying something by 0 is 0)

say you want to get the decimal number of the octal number 5756. let's get the powers that we need:

  • 83 = 512
  • 82 = 64
  • 81 = 8
  • 80 = 1

and 5*512 + 7*64 + 5*8 + 6*1 = 3054. this will work for every octal(/binary) number!

taswelll #3422

x*B^(y-1)/(B-1) where x = 7, y = 2, B = 10

taswelll #3408

coral

taswelll #3386

darksalmon

taswelll #3384

all css colours, i think

taswelll #3356

foots

taswelll #3334

‼ beats ! because it is outnumbered

taswelll #3333

good

taswelll #3332

0⍴0