natural number thread. #177

25, because it's composite and thus better.

420 bc weed 😔

432, a good approximation for 420 but with more prime factors

2417851600000000000000000 because it equals 2^(3^4) (or 2^81)

i find that questionable given that any power of 2 cannot have prime factors other than 2, and yet that clearly has 5 as a prime factor.

as such, 5 is clearly better.

2 is the basis of all digital bases, so it is best

1 is the lowest integer and can also make every integer

1 is not the lowest integer (counterexample: 0 is an integer and is lower than 1). 2^81 is 2417851639229258349412352, not 2417851600000000000000000.

i think that 19683 is a good number (nanpa pona) but i will not reveal why

ah, my apologies

1302, since it is the id of this post

i think that 4 is a four number (nanpa po

NaN is literally "Not a Number". it's not a natural number, nor is it any other type of number.

in any case, 132 is better than all of these numbers due to its digital (hand) expression in binary.

413 is the most natual folloed by 612